FULL VIDEO AT THE END OF THE POST
Family Ties and Property Disputes
Ms. Rogers appeared in court as the defendant.
Mr. Harrison was the plaintiff in the case.
He was the husband of Ms. Rogers' deceased aunt.
Mr. Harrison and his wife had been married for approximately 20 years.
His wife passed away in September 2016.
They had purchased a house together during their marriage.
After his wife's passing, discussions began in October 2018 for Ms. Rogers to lease-to-own this house.
Mr. Harrison stated he was not living in the house at that time.
He had moved in with his girlfriend.
Ms. Rogers moved into the house under a lease-to-own agreement.
The arrangement did not work out.
Ms. Rogers eventually left the property.
Allegations of Missing Furniture and Damages
Mr. Harrison claimed that when Ms. Rogers left, she took all the furniture.
He also alleged she failed to pay an electric bill.
Furthermore, he claimed she caused damage to the property.
Ms. Rogers had filed an answer to the claims.
Judge Judy noted that Ms. Rogers' answer did not explicitly deny taking furniture.
Instead, her answer stated, "I took what was rightfully mine."
Ms. Rogers clarified that there were several items in the home not part of the agreement.
Judge Judy asked Ms. Rogers directly what items she took from the house.
Ms. Rogers initially mentioned pictures and blankets.
Judge Judy then specifically asked if she took any furniture.
Ms. Rogers responded, "No, ma'am."
The Missing Master Bedroom Set
Mr. Harrison alleged that Ms. Rogers took two bedroom sets.
He specified one was a seven-piece master bedroom set.
Judge Judy asked Ms. Rogers about the master bedroom set.
Ms. Rogers brought up a police report.
She claimed Mr. Harrison entered the property while she was still living there.
She stated that a lot of stuff went missing after his visit.
She also mentioned finding his keys.
Judge Judy emphasized the significance of a seven-piece master bedroom set.
She noted it was not just "a couple of things that came up missing."
Ms. Rogers acknowledged this point.
She offered to show photos to the court.
Ms. Rogers lived in the house with her two children and her brother.
The house had four bedrooms.
Lease Agreement Details
Judge Judy reviewed the lease-to-purchase agreement.
The agreement explicitly stated that the premises were furnished.
It included a list of specific items.
The list mentioned a "seven-piece master bedroom set."
It also listed "one king bed" and "two dining room sets."
An "antique stool" was also on the list.
Judge Judy read these items directly from the agreement.
Ms. Rogers confirmed the presence of such a list.
She maintained, "I did not take any of those items from the house."
Police Report and Trespassing Claims
Ms. Rogers reiterated her claim about the police report.
She stated Mr. Harrison entered the property while she was still living there.
She described his entry as trespassing.
She said he was "criminally trespassed."
Judge Judy questioned the relevance of this to the missing furniture.
Ms. Rogers argued that several things were missing after his entry.
Judge Judy pointed out the difference between "several things" and a seven-piece bedroom set.
She also mentioned coffee tables and dining room sets.
Judge Judy asked Ms. Rogers if she was "playing with me."
Ms. Rogers denied this, stating, "Not at all."
She admitted it sounded "ridiculous."
Judge Judy agreed it sounded "absolutely ridiculous."
Lack of Furniture Receipts
Judge Judy noted Ms. Rogers could not show receipts for any furniture she purchased.
She reasoned that if Ms. Rogers had her own furniture, she wouldn't have signed an agreement for a furnished house.