FULL VIDEO AT THE END OF THIS POST
YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE ENGAGEMENT WAS BROKEN!
A Broken Engagement and Unpaid Bills
Imagine a courtroom where a broken engagement leads to a dispute over a wedding dress and car impound fees.
That is the scene in Judge Judy's courtroom.
The Plaintiff Seeks Reimbursement
Eureka Star is the plaintiff.
She is suing her ex-fiancée, Tamika Taylor.
Eureka wants money for a wedding dress.
She also wants impound fees for a car.
The Engagement and the Dress
Eureka and Tamika were engaged.
Their wedding date was July 16th, 2016.
The wedding never happened.
Tamika purchased a wedding dress.
Eureka was with her at the time.
Eureka put the $1,050 dress on her credit card.
The Defendant's Side of the Story
Tamika claims Eureka broke off the engagement.
She believes Eureka is stuck with the dress.
This is her defense regarding the dress.
Judge Judy asks about their living arrangement.
They lived together.
Eureka contributed more financially.
She made more money.
The Wedding Expenses Add Up
Judge Judy asks about other wedding expenses.
Eureka mentions a deposit for a wedding hall.
It was $250.
Tamika initially implies it was lost.
Then she clarifies.
The $250 deposit was returned.
This leaves only the wedding dress as a shared expense.
Judge Judy Questions Fairness
Judge Judy considers the dress cost.
She asks if it's fair for Tamika to be stuck with the entire dress.
Especially since the engagement ended.
Eureka mentions interest on her credit card for the dress.
Judge Judy dismisses this.
She focuses on the original $1,050 cost.
The dress is the only remaining joint expense.
The Car Impoundment
The discussion shifts to a car.
The car is in both their names.
It was impounded in September.
Tamika was driving it without insurance.
Her previous policy had lapsed.
Eureka paid $1,200 to get the car out of impound.
Who Has the Car Now?
Tamika currently has the car.
Eureka calls herself a "dummy" for paying the impound fees.
The car is a 2012 Chevy Impala.
It was purchased in February 2016.
The cost was $20,000.
It is still in Eureka's name.
Car Payments and Insurance
Tamika is supposed to be paying for the car.
She hasn't made a payment since September.
She states she has no job.
Judge Judy reminds Tamika about a signed document.
It mandated full coverage insurance on the car.
This was required until it was paid off.
Tamika confirms she signed it.
Judge Judy's Frustration
Judge Judy expresses her frustration.
She calls both parties irresponsible.
Driving without insurance is outrageous.
Not making payments on a $20,000 car is also outrageous.
Watch the Full Judge Judy Case Below
See how Judge Judy handles this complicated breakup.
The verdict is swift.
Scroll down.
Press play.
FULL VIDEO
CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItsXXIrGWFE
