FULL VIDEO AT THE END OF THE POST
A Friend in Need
Miss Green and Miss Rix found themselves in Judge Judy's courtroom.
Miss Green was suing Miss Rix and Miss Hudson.
She sought $3,500 for her furniture.
She also claimed damages for pain and suffering due to an alleged assault.
The relationship between Miss Green and Miss Rix began through Miss Rix's daughter, Ari.
Ari and Miss Green attended school together in Chicago.
In November 2013, Miss Green moved from Chicago to Rockford, Illinois.
She moved with her son.
She had found subsidized, low-income housing there.
However, she soon wanted to return to Chicago.
She explained that she had no one to care for her son while she worked in Rockford.
Moving Back to Chicago
Miss Green moved back to Chicago in November 2013.
Miss Rix and Miss Hudson offered her a place to stay.
At this time, Miss Green had no job, no money, and a child.
An agreement was made upon her moving in.
Miss Green was to immediately seek employment.
Once employed, she would begin paying rent.
Judge Judy emphasized that Miss Rix and Miss Hudson were not related to Miss Green.
They were not obligated to support her.
Miss Green confirmed she understood this agreement.
Unpaid Rent and Section 8 Concerns
Judge Judy questioned Miss Green about her job search.
Miss Green admitted she did not find a job in November.
She also did not find one in December.
January and February also passed without employment.
Judge Judy asked who supported Miss Green during these months.
Miss Rix interjected, stating she paid Miss Green's rent.
Miss Rix also mentioned "Bird" helped with the rent.
Miss Rix was on Section 8 housing.
Judge Judy pointed out the implications of this.
Housing Miss Green and her child would violate Section 8 rules.
Miss Rix acknowledged this.
The Furniture Claim
Miss Green claimed she brought a significant amount of furniture with her.
This included a bedroom set, a living room set, tables, lamps, a rug, a TV, and curtains.
She stated she had "refurbished her whole house" with these items.
She was seeking $3,500 for the value of this furniture.
Miss Rix, however, had a different account.
She claimed Miss Green told her she could keep the furniture.
According to Miss Rix, Miss Green said, "I owe you, but you can just have that stuff. I'm gone."
Miss Rix later admitted to selling the furniture.
She sold it to her cousin for $300.
Allegations of Assault
Miss Green also sought damages for pain and suffering.
She alleged an assault occurred in mid-July.
She claimed Miss Rix's daughter, Camisha, and other sisters attacked her.
This happened during an argument.
Judge Judy asked about evidence of the assault.
Miss Green stated she had pictures.
She said her "boss thought" she had a "quick wheelie in."
However, she had no hospital records.
She also did not have a police report.
Judge Judy asked why she did not go to the hospital.
Miss Green replied she was "just really mad" at the time.
She also did not file a police report immediately.
She explained that she waited a couple of days.
The police then told her it was too late.
The Argument Over Employment
The core of the dispute revolved around Miss Green's employment.
Miss Rix claimed Miss Green was working "under the table."
She alleged Miss Green was doing hair for clients.
Miss Rix believed Miss Green was making money but not contributing to household expenses.
Miss Green initially stated she did not have a job for eight months.
However, she later admitted to doing hair for clients during that time.
She started a formal job on June 1st.
Miss Green claimed she told Miss Rix about her new job in June.
She said they agreed on $200 rent for July.
This contradicted her earlier statement about never paying rent.
Contradictory Statements on Rent
Judge Judy pressed Miss Green on rent payments.
Miss Green stated she never paid anything.
She claimed the agreement was that she didn't have to pay.
She said Miss Rix knew her situation.
Miss Rix's defense was that she confronted Miss Green.
The confrontation was about Miss Green working and doing hair.
Miss Rix believed Miss Green should have been contributing.
Both parties agreed this was the subject of their argument.
Furniture Proof Issues
Judge Judy requested receipts for the furniture.
Miss Green presented a "48-hour lease agreement" from "errands."
She claimed this was how she obtained the furniture.
Judge Judy noted the lease agreement.
However, she asked for proof of payment.
Miss Green stated, "That was all I had."
She claimed she paid cash for the furniture.
She also said she had lost a lot of information after moving.
Judge Judy expressed skepticism.
She suggested Miss Green might have never paid for the furniture.
Judge Judy's Frustration
Judge Judy continued to press for payment proof.
She explained that if one pays for a lease, they get a receipt.
She asked Miss Green why she looked confused.
Miss Green reiterated that the lease agreement was all they could give her.
She claimed she asked for the information she needed.
Judge Judy emphasized that Miss Green should have received receipts for payments.
She stated, "I'm losing my patience."
Judge Judy then ended the discussion on the furniture.
Verdict Not Stated
The provided transcript does not contain a stated verdict.
The outcome of the case is also not stated.