FULL VIDEO AT THE END OF THIS POST
YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHAT SHE TOLD JUDGE JUDY!
A Puppy Sale Turns Into a Courtroom Battle
Imagine a teacher selling a puppy to a former student.
Now imagine that puppy getting seriously ill.
Then imagine the teacher paying a $4,000 vet bill.
This is the scene Judge Judy faces.
The Plaintiff Seeks Reimbursement
The plaintiff is a former teacher.
She sold a German Shepherd puppy to Ms. Fry.
Ms. Fry was her student at the time.
The dog later developed a severe leg infection.
The plaintiff paid the vet bill.
She is now suing Ms. Fry for reimbursement.
The Defendant's Living Situation Raises Questions
Judge Judy questions the plaintiff about selling a puppy to an 18-year-old.
She asks about Ms. Fry's family issues.
The plaintiff clarifies that Ms. Fry was living with her grandmother.
She was not living with her parents.
Judge Judy then asks Ms. Fry about her current living situation.
Ms. Fry lives with her boyfriend.
They live with his parents.
Neither Ms. Fry nor her boyfriend are currently working.
The boyfriend states he has a job interview.
He claims he will have a job upon returning from court.
The Dog's Illness and the Vet Bill
Judge Judy summarizes the situation.
The dog got a bad infection.
Ms. Fry and her boyfriend couldn't handle it.
They waited to take the dog to the vet.
The bill grew to over $4,000.
The plaintiff learned about the illness when Ms. Fry called her.
The plaintiff paid the vet bill.
She says the alternative was the dog dying.
Ms. Fry confirms the vet bill was for her dog.
She still has the dog.
Evidence Presented to the Court
The plaintiff presents several pieces of evidence.
She shows the vet bills.
She has pictures of the dog's injury.
Text messages from Ms. Fry agreeing to pay are also submitted.
Pictures of the puppy when it was sold are included.
The plaintiff emphasizes the importance of her witness.
The witness will explain Ms. Fry's neglect of the dog.
The witness will also speak about the bill.
The Witness Details Neglect
The plaintiff's witness is Katie.
Katie explains the dog had a puncture wound.
Ms. Fry did not want to take it to the vet.
Katie paid the first vet bill.
The vet told Ms. Fry to return the next day.
Ms. Fry waited over a week.
The plaintiff recounts Ms. Fry calling her on a Friday evening.
The dog's leg was swollen.
This led to an emergency vet visit.
The plaintiff also has email exchanges.
In these emails, Ms. Fry acknowledges owing the money.
Judge Judy's Stern Advice
Judge Judy gives the plaintiff some advice.
She tells her not to sell dogs to teenagers.
She calls it a mistake.
Teenagers are "idiots" who don't know how to care for anything, she states.
Ms. Fry's Contradictory Statements
Judge Judy questions Ms. Fry about working at Pizza Hut.
She references an email.
In the email, Ms. Fry mentioned her Pizza Hut W2 for repayment.
Ms. Fry initially denies working at Pizza Hut at that time.
She then admits to having worked there.
Ms. Fry confirms she said she would pay back the vet bill.
She would pay it when she received her W2.
She felt obligated, she states.
The Verdict and a Request for the Dog
Judge Judy gives judgment for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff then asks a question.
She asks if she can get a judgment to buy her dog back.
She cites animal abuse by Ms. Fry.
Judge Judy states she cannot give a judgment to buy the dog back.
Who Can Better Care for the Dog?
Judge Judy asks Ms. Fry a direct question.
She asks if Ms. Fry or the plaintiff is in a better position to care for the dog.
Ms. Fry claims she is in a better position.
She states her dog comes second only to rent.
Judge Judy questions how Ms. Fry pays rent if she doesn't work.
Ms. Fry replies she has money saved.
She also gets money from interviews.
Judge Judy expresses disbelief.
She finds Ms. Fry's explanation of paying rent from interviews ridiculous.
Judge Judy's Final Thoughts
Judge Judy concludes the case.
She tells the plaintiff that sometimes you live with the guilt of an error in judgment.
The plaintiff expresses her distress.
She is concerned about the dog's condition.
She calls Ms. Fry's care animal abuse.
The plaintiff reiterates her love for the dog.
She regrets letting it go to Ms. Fry.
Ms. Fry states the plaintiff already has many animals.
She questions the plaintiff's ability to care for another.
Watch the Full Judge Judy Case Below
See the full exchange.
Witness the contradictions.
Scroll down.
Press play.
FULL VIDEO
CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y9wjf-w2wg
