FULL VIDEO AT THE END OF THIS POST
THIS BASEBALL TOURNAMENT WAS A MESS!
A Baseball Tournament Turns Into a Courtroom Battle
Imagine stepping into Judge Judy's courtroom.
The air is tense.
A dispute over a baseball tournament is about to unfold.
The Coach Seeks a Refund
The plaintiff is a baseball team coach.
He participated in a tournament.
He is suing for money back.
He claims he was misled about the tournament.
The Organizer Counterclaims
Alex Bentley is a defendant.
He organized the tournament.
He is counterclaiming for unpaid fees.
He also wants lost wages.
Mr. Finnegan is also a defendant.
The Tournament Details Emerge
Judge Judy admits her limited sports knowledge.
She wants the details simplified.
The plaintiff confirms he coaches a baseball team.
His team played in a tournament.
The grand prize was $10,000.
The participation fee was $1,500 per team.
How the Teams Were Recruited
The plaintiff states the defendants approached them.
They were asked to join the tournament.
Alex Bentley confirms this.
He approached the plaintiff on September 1st.
This was two weeks before the tournament.
Alex Bentley says they had 9 or 10 teams signed up.
They needed 12 teams for a $10,000 profit.
The Deposit and Lack of Paperwork
The plaintiff states they did not sign up.
They gave a $200 deposit at the meeting.
No documentation was signed.
The plaintiff confirms the $200 deposit.
They said they would try to make it happen.
No papers were signed before the tournament.
The tournament took place on September 14th.
A Late Notification
The plaintiff states they only contributed $200.
They had notified Mr. Bentley they couldn't afford to play.
They had committed to another tournament.
The plaintiff confirms sending an email notification.
This was on September 12th.
It was two days before the tournament.
Judge Judy notes this was "a little late in the game."
The "Ringer" Controversy
Judge Judy asks for the definition of a "ringer."
The plaintiff explains a "ringer" is not a typical team player.
They are brought in for a short period.
They are usually good players.
The plaintiff states they played in the tournament.
They understood they could only afford $600.
Mr. Bentley said "pay what you can."
The plaintiff states they gave $500 in total.
Mr. Bentley offered a reduced rate of $1,200.
This was because he needed more teams.
The plaintiff states they did not receive any "ringers."
The plaintiff explains "ringers" are like ex-professional players.
They beef up a team.
Judge Judy states the suggestion of providing "ringers" is dishonest.
Judge Judy Calls Out Dishonesty
Alex Bentley argues it was an "open tournament."
Teams could bring whomever they wanted.
Judge Judy reiterates her point.
Offering to beef up a team is sleazy.
It induces participation for a $10,000 prize.
Alex Bentley states "The Dirty Birds" won the $10,000 prize.
Alex Bentley confirms he played in the tournament.
He filled in for an extra team.
He played two games.
None were against the Dirty Birds.
Misled Expectations
The plaintiff explains they expected to play "rec teams."
They encountered a higher level of competition.
They felt misled.
The plaintiff states he told Alex what they could pay.
He wouldn't have gone if Alex hadn't agreed.
The plaintiff states he spent the tournament trying to get money from players.
They had already committed to another tournament.
Judge Judy's Firm Stance on Responsibility
Judge Judy tells the plaintiff about financial responsibility.
"If you've already committed you don't have the money, you don't play."
"You don't get your money back."
The Counterclaim for Lost Wages
Alex Bentley presents a counterclaim.
He wants the remainder of tournament fees.
He also wants lost wages.
He explains his lost wages.
He took time off work to deal with the money issue.
He also took time for court.
Judge Judy's Dislike for "Ringer"
Judge Judy expresses her dislike for the term "ringer."
Alex Bentley presents a video and a document.
He states the document shows the plaintiff signed it.
It agreed to pay the remaining balance in four days.
The Promissory Note
The plaintiff confirms he signed the document.
Judge Judy identifies it as a promissory note for $500.
It was due by September 19th.
The plaintiff states he paid $500 initially.
He never received a copy of the hand-written information.
The plaintiff confirms he paid the initial $500.
He did not pay the additional amount.
Watch the Full Judge Judy Case Below
This case had twists and turns.
See how Judge Judy handles the "ringer" argument.
Scroll down.
Press play.
FULL VIDEO
CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp_6nNAeUm0
