Case File

Sister Denies Dog Vomited on Computer

FULL VIDEO AT THE END OF THE POST

The Sisterly Dispute Begins

Ms. Masuka, the plaintiff, brought her younger sister, Ms. Weeks, to court.

Ms. Masuka presented three main claims against her sister.

First, she alleged that Ms. Weeks borrowed her computer and returned it broken.

Second, Ms. Masuka claimed she loaned Ms. Weeks $500 for an apartment deposit, which was never repaid.

Third, Ms. Masuka accused Ms. Weeks of assault during a confrontation at her home.

Ms. Weeks, the defendant, denied these allegations.

She claimed the computer was already broken when she returned it.

Regarding the $500, Ms. Weeks stated it was not a loan but a payment for babysitting and other services she provided.

She also asserted that she was merely defending herself during the alleged assault.

The Computer Loan and Damage

The dispute over the computer began in January.

Ms. Masuka stated she gave Ms. Weeks her computer on January 18th.

Ms. Weeks needed the computer to search for an apartment and jobs.

Ms. Weeks claimed she had the computer for less than a week.

She stated that on approximately the fifth day, the computer stopped working.

It would not turn on or off, according to Ms. Weeks.

She insisted she did nothing to cause the damage.

Ms. Weeks returned the computer on the sixth day.

She maintained that she returned it in one piece, but it was not working.

Ms. Masuka had a different account of the computer's return.

She testified that Ms. Weeks came to her house on January 22nd with the laptop in a plastic bag.

Ms. Masuka opened the door, and Ms. Weeks immediately said, "A man, I'm so sorry."

Ms. Masuka asked what was going on.

Ms. Weeks then told her that her dog had spilled something on the computer.

Ms. Weeks admitted she tried to fix it or dry it out.

She was attempting to air dry it and put it back together.

Ms. Masuka recalled Ms. Weeks promising to pay for the computer or fix it.

Ms. Masuka told her sister that the computer could not be fixed after something was spilled on it.

Ms. Weeks reiterated her promise to pay for it.

The $500 Apartment Deposit Loan

The next claim involved a $500 loan.

Ms. Masuka testified that Ms. Weeks needed money for a security deposit on an apartment.

Ms. Weeks already had the first month's rent.

Ms. Masuka recalled that she and her husband had just received their tax return.

The date was January 30th.

Ms. Masuka told Ms. Weeks that they had bought a computer with their tax return money.

She offered Ms. Weeks the option to make $25 payments on it.

Ms. Weeks agreed to this arrangement.

During their conversation, Ms. Weeks asked if Ms. Masuka could loan her $500 for the security deposit.

Ms. Masuka agreed to lend the money.

She made it clear that Ms. Weeks needed to pay her back.

Ms. Weeks assured her sister that she would repay the loan.

She mentioned working at a gas station for 40 hours a week.

Ms. Weeks' Contradictory Statements

Judge Judy questioned Ms. Weeks about her knowledge of Ms. Masuka's computer.

Initially, Ms. Weeks claimed she did not know Ms. Masuka had a computer.

However, she later stated she knew Ms. Masuka owned both a laptop and a desktop computer.

This inconsistency was noted by the court.

Ms. Weeks also offered a different explanation for the $500.

She claimed the money was a gift or an "even exchange" for babysitting and driving services.

However, Ms. Weeks admitted that she only proposed this "even exchange" after Ms. Masuka started asking for the money back.

Sponsored