Case File

Man Never Fully Paid for Two Cars!

FULL VIDEO AT THE END OF THIS POST

YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHAT HE TOLD JUDGE JUDY!

A Messy Car Deal Lands in Court

Imagine trying to explain a car purchase to Judge Judy.

Now imagine doing it twice.

That is the situation Mr. Waylon finds himself in.

The Plaintiff Seeks Payment for Two Cars

Mr. Goodman, the plaintiff, claims he financed two cars for Mr. Waylon.

He says Mr. Waylon has not fully paid for either.

Mr. Goodman explains that Mr. Waylon was a co-worker of his son.

He became like a surrogate son to the family.

The First Car: A Mighty Max

Judge Judy asks Mr. Waylon about the first car.

He identifies it as an '83 Mighty Max.

It is a small pickup from the '80s.

Mr. Waylon estimates the price was around $3,500 or $4,000.

Judge Judy asks if he has a bill of sale.

He says no.

Mr. Goodman clarifies that he financed the car.

Mr. Waylon bought it from Mr. Warming, a witness.

Judge Judy Questions Mr. Waylon's Confusion

Judge Judy asks Mr. Waylon if he is confused.

She asks if he is on any controlled substance.

Mr. Waylon denies it.

Judge Judy points out his confusion.

She explains that Mr. Goodman financed the car.

Mr. Waylon bought it from someone else.

She asks if Mr. Warming is the gentleman he bought the Mighty Max from.

Mr. Waylon confirms this.

No Bill of Sale

Judge Judy asks Mr. Waylon for the bill of sale.

He states he did not bring it.

He did not think he would need it.

Mr. Goodman interjects.

He says he can shed some light on the situation.

He explains the money for the car came from his line of credit.

He notes there are two vehicles in play.

Payments and Repossession

Judge Judy asks Mr. Waylon how much he paid back on the $4,500 financed for the Mighty Max.

Mr. Waylon says he gave him about $400 one time.

He claims it was more like a "pay when you can" arrangement.

Mr. Goodman disputes this.

Judge Judy silences Mr. Waylon.

She reminds him he drove one of the cars without a license.

That car was impounded.

Mr. Waylon confirms this.

Mr. Goodman states Mr. Waylon paid approximately $800.

Judge Judy asks where the '83 Mighty Max is now.

Mr. Goodman says it is in his yard.

He repossessed the vehicle.

The First Claim Dismissed

Judge Judy states they are not interested in that car.

She tells Mr. Goodman he has to sell it.

Mr. Goodman claims the car is damaged.

He says its value is diminished.

Judge Judy explains that the claim for the first car is premature.

To show what he lost, Mr. Goodman must sell the car.

He needs to sell it to a bona fide buyer.

He must advertise and sell it.

The difference between the sale price and what Mr. Waylon paid would be his damages.

Mr. Goodman understands.

Judge Judy dismisses the claim for the '83 car without prejudice.

Mr. Goodman can return after selling the car.

If there is a deficiency, they can discuss it then.

The Second Car: A 2004 Runner

Judge Judy moves on to the second car.

It is a '96, 2004 runner.

She asks Mr. Waylon how much he paid for it.

He says he does not recall exactly.

He claims there was no set payment.

He states the bill was $2,000.

Mr. Goodman clarifies the total was $2,150.

This included some repairs.

Unlicensed Driving and Impoundment

Judge Judy asks Mr. Waylon if he made any payments on the second car.

He says yes.

He claims he paid over half of it back.

Mr. Goodman states they paid a total of $560.

Judge Judy calculates Mr. Waylon owes $1,690 on that car.

She notes the car was in Mr. Waylon's possession.

His girlfriend, Miss Hale, drove it with his permission.

She did not have a license.

The car was pulled over and impounded.

Mr. Waylon confirms this.

He states neither he nor Miss Hale had a license to get it out.

They also lacked the money.

The car was sold at auction.

Judge Judy's Stern Warning

Judge Judy tells Mr. Waylon he owes Mr. Goodman $1,690.

He no longer has the car.

She explains he owes the money because he should have used his brain.

He should not drive a car without a license.

He should not allow someone else to drive a car without a license.

Mr. Waylon claims they could not get information by mail.

He says they live out of their cars.

It is their only transportation.

Without a mailing address, they did not know where the car was impounded.

They did not know how much was owed.

They did not know how to get it out.

The License Suspension Explanation

Judge Judy asks if Mr. Waylon was driving with a suspended license or no license.

Miss Hale, the girlfriend, states her license was suspended.

Judge Judy asks why.

Miss Hale initially says it was for an unpaid ticket.

She then corrects herself.

Her license was suspended because her registration was incomplete.

She had paid the fees but it needed to be smogged.

This flagged it in the system.

She says all fees were paid, but it was incomplete.

The Verdict

Judge Judy issues a judgment for the plaintiff.

The amount is $1,690.

She concludes the case.

Watch the Full Judge Judy Case Below

See how Judge Judy handles this complicated car dispute.

The excuses do not hold up.

Scroll down.

Press play.

FULL VIDEO

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POzDtEOxMGk

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bmA1OAjmQE

Sponsored